Solution 17.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solmelia & Accor Ratios for 2007 (10 expected) |
|
Solmelia |
|
Accor |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability - 2 or 3 |
|
€m |
|
€m |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROCE |
|
Profit before finance cost |
|
236.6 |
10.45% |
1,210 |
22.78% |
||
|
|
Capital employed |
|
2,265.9 |
|
5312 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CE = |
Total assets |
2,865.9 |
10,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
(600) |
(5,522) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,265.9 |
5,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin, |
Profit before Interest |
|
236.6 |
17.5% |
1,210 |
14.9% |
|||
|
|
Revenue |
|
1,350.7 |
|
8,121 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOE |
Profit before tax |
|
179.1 |
17.4% |
1,146 |
30.5% |
|||
|
Ord share cap & reserves |
1,027.0 |
|
3,752 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency - 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cap Empl Turn |
Revenue |
|
1,350.7 |
0.596 |
8,121 |
1.528 |
|||
|
|
Capital employed |
|
2,265.9 |
|
5,312 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gearing - 1 or 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Debt to equity |
Net debt |
|
1,050.2 |
102.3% |
278 |
7.4% |
|||
|
|
Ordinary share cap & res. |
1,027.0 |
|
3,752 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cover |
Profit before fin cost |
|
236.6 |
4.1 |
1,210 |
18.9 |
|||
|
|
Finance cost. |
57.5 |
|
64 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow - 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Quality of earnings |
Cash from oper activity |
|
348.0 |
211% |
1,415 |
155% |
|||
|
|
Profit for year (after tax) |
164.6 |
|
912 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt service capability. |
Cash from oper activity |
|
348.0 |
33% |
1,415 |
509% |
|||
|
|
Net debt |
|
1,050.2 |
|
278 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investors - 3 or 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Aver no. of shares in mill. (37.0/.20, 665/3.0) |
185 |
|
222 |
|
|||||
Market price per share at year-end, in Euro cents |
1,042 |
|
5,470 |
|
|||||
Market price per share at start of year, in Euro cents |
1,501 |
|
5,870 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earn per share in c |
Prof for year (aft tax & pref) |
|
165 |
89.0 |
912 |
411.4 |
|||
|
|
Aver no. ord shares |
|
185 |
|
222 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P/E ratio |
Mark val per share |
|
1,042 |
11.7 |
5,470 |
13.3 |
|||
(based curr yr earn) |
Earnings per share |
|
89.0 |
|
411.4 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Div per share in €c |
Ord dividends paid |
|
27 |
14.6 |
680 |
306.8 |
|||
|
|
Aver no. ord shares |
|
185 |
|
222 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Div payout % |
Ord div paid |
|
27 |
16% |
680 |
75% |
|||
|
|
Profit aft tax and pref. |
165 |
|
912 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Yield |
Div per share |
|
14.6 |
1.41% |
306.8 |
5.61% |
|||
|
|
Mark val per share |
|
1,042 |
|
5,470 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total return per share |
Div + close val - open val |
-444.4 |
-29.6% |
-93.2 |
-1.6% |
||||
|
|
Open value |
|
1,501 |
|
5,870 |
|
||
|
Solmelia |
(15 + 1042 - 1501) / 1501 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Accor |
(307 + 5470 - 5870) / 5870 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4(b) |
Comments on Performance of Solmelia and Accor for 2007 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accor is by far the larger company. Its revenue of €8,121 million was 6.0 times Solmelia's €1,351 |
|||||||||
million, and its capital employed of €4,318 million was 1.9 times Solmelia's €2,296 million. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the return on capital employed, the primary accounting measure of performance, |
|||||||||
Accor was the more successful company. Its return was an exceptional 23% compared to a |
|||||||||
more normal 10.3% for Solmelia. There were two main factors causing this. |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accor's operating margin of 14.9% was lower than Solmelia's 17.5%. Solmelia's higher margin |
|||||||||
was due to relatively lower costs and higher prices. |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However Accor was much more efficient in generating revenue from assets employed, with a |
|||||||||
turnover of capital employed of 1.88 compared to only 0.59 for Solmelia. |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similarly, the difference in pre-tax return on equity, a primary indicator of accounting profitability |
|||||||||
for the shareholders, was considerable. Accor earned a very high 30.5% compared to 17.4% for |
|||||||||
Solmelia. These were higher than the ROCE above. Accor's return on its capital of 23% was |
|||||||||
greater than the interest rate payable on its debt of 23% (64/278) and this boosted its return on |
|||||||||
equity. Solmelia's return on its capital of 10.3% was also greater than the interest rate payable |
|||||||||
on its debt of 5.5% (58/1,050). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the area of financial gearing, Accor has much lower gearing. It had a very low net debt to |
|||||||||
equity ratio of only 7% compared to a high 102% for Solmelia. It had a very high interest cover |
|||||||||
of 18.9 compared to an adequate 4.1 for Solmelia. Neither company should have difficulty |
|||||||||
meeting its interest payments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accor's cash from operating activities as a percent of profit after tax was 155% compared to |
|||||||||
211% for Solmelia. Hence Solmelia's profits are of a higher quality as they bring in much more |
|||||||||
cash than the accruals-based "paper" profit in the income statement. |
|
|
|||||||
Accor's cash from operations as a percent of net debt was 509%. Hence only 0.2 years (100/509) |
|||||||||
of 2007 cash profits would enable the company to repay its debt. Solmelia's operating cash was |
|||||||||
33% of its debt. Hence 3 years (100/33) of cash profits would be required to repay its debt. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The price-earnings ratio at 31 December 2007, based on that year's profit, was an average 13.3 |
|||||||||
for Accor, compared to 11.7 Solmelia. Hence the stock market is less pessimistic about Accor's |
|||||||||
future performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The dividend payout as a percent of profit was a high 75% for Accor but only 16% for Solmelia. |
|||||||||
The norm in Europe is some 40%. The dividend yield was 5.6% for Accor compared to only 1.4% |
|||||||||
for Solmelia. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However based on the company's share price performance, 2007 was not a good year, and Accor |
|||||||||
did much better than Solmelia. Accor's share price decreased during the year from 5,870 to 5,470 |
|||||||||
cents, a fall of 7%. This was due to reduced confidence in the company's future prospects. |
|||||||||
However Solmelia's share price decreased by 31% from 1,501 cents to 1,042 cents. |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hence the total return per share (dividends +/- change in price) was a negative 1.6% for Accor |
|||||||||
compared to a negative 30% for Solmelia. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall in 2007, Accor's accounting ratios were better than Solmelia's. Its share price also fell by |
|||||||||
a much smaller larger amount. Solmelia needs to improve its profitability and reduce its debt, |
|||||||||
which should lead to a recovery in its share price and price-earnings ratio. |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|